you are currently reading...
China, Consumption, Gear, iPad, Objects of Power

“Public Walking iPads” as Portable Distinction

20131102-072859.jpg

A distinct intersection of multiple capitals.

The other day while in the check-in line at the Beijing airport a middle aged man in smart business casual dress, with a modest rollaboard suitcase just also happened to be plugged into his iPad watching a Hollywood blockbuster. The bustle of the airport, the crowded checkin line, the juggling of luggage in one hand and the precarious balancing of an expensive, unprotected 4th generation 3G iPad in the other, made me cringe. A single unexpected bump or slip and the iPad would crash to the ground.

The man in the check-in line was just the latest example of what I have come to think of as the “public walking iPad.” Since my first trips to China in the iPad era I have noticed the way that iPads are conspicuiously carried around by some people in all manner of venues and at moments where their use as iPads seems secondary to their signal use as “iPads.” I have seen folks carrying them underarm in crowded streets and shopping malls—places where they are very visible and, it seems to me, easily damaged. In fact, the first time I noticed a “public walking iPad” it was because the owner was plugged in playing a video game with one hand while occasionally looking up to navigate her way through a packed shopping mall. My curiosity about the behavior was secondary to my fear for the safety of the iPad.

I am reluctant to interpret the “walking iPad” behavior without actually talking to one of its practitioners. Standing in line waiting to check in with nothing better to do, however, than think about what I was observing I found myself thinking of Bourdieu. Specifically, I was intrigued by the way that the man with the iPad was a singular point of overlapping notions of capital—standing in line for an international flight, clearly a businessman on a short trip (judging from his small amount of luggage), part of a social network of global business exchange, carrying an expensive object which represents not only a degree of economic capital but also the associations of connoisseurship that attach to a global brand like Apple. Furthermore he was watching a Hollywood blockbuster on the iPad—another educational moment in the lingua franca of global popular culture entertainment.

The iPad is more than just a physical object. It is a symbolic index and a gateway to sociocultural “content.” It is a thing and a mode of delivery. Like the fictional time traveling TARDIS of Doctor Who, the iPad is bigger on the inside than the outside. It is always more than what it seems. Similarly, the figure of the “walking iPad” is also always more than what he or she seems—like a time-space traveller who is both present and absent at any given location—a figure that is split between the here and now and the other places that the technology can deliver. The businessman was in line and not, he was receiving messages from Hollywood even as he was sending messages to everyone around him.

Of course, even as I considered this, I was also nervous that an unexpected jostle, slip, or bump would send his iPad crashing to the ground.

 

I’ll post other images of public walking iPads here as I take them:

Discussion

5 thoughts on ““Public Walking iPads” as Portable Distinction

  1. Do you think that those who undertake these endeavors do the calculation of “my hip-ness vs the cost of a new iPad”? Of course, I always assume that if they have ever dropped one in the past, they wouldn’t do that behavior anymore. Your thoughts?

    Posted by Andy "SuperFly" Rundquist | November 2, 2013, 9:04 am
  2. I was thinking that it could be more than “just” conspicuous consumption—another message could be: “I’m wealthy enough to not only afford a cool iPad, but carry it around in a cavalier manner—not worried about if it is accidentally destroyed. (By contrast, I have my iPad sheathed in protective armor and am always sure to keep it safe—it is a pricey object for an anthropology professor’s meager salary.)

    Posted by Museum Fatigue | November 2, 2013, 9:17 am
  3. Hi David

    You might like Genevieve Bell’s observations on the use of paper replicas of digital devices such as iPads and iPhones in Chinese communities, intended for burning as offerings to their dead ancestors. Lots of symbolic values there …

    Deborah

    Posted by Deborah Lupton | November 2, 2013, 10:06 pm
  4. Thank you for the suggestion, Deborah. When I was in Malaysia a few years ago I bought a small collection of those paper objects, including a paper iPhone. I use mine for teaching, but would enjoy reading an account of their use. If it is accessible to undergraduates I could even have my students read it.

    Posted by Museum Fatigue | November 3, 2013, 6:15 am
    • Bell’s article is short and accessible to students – it was published in Communications of the ACM magazine, December 2011.

      As for worrying about how people handle their devices, trying observing what parents let their toddlers and small children do with their smartphones and tablets!

      Posted by Deborah Lupton | November 3, 2013, 3:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: